NOOLF Home Page NO OLF Home page View Image Full Size (BIG)
Home PageHome Page
Other NO OLF Groups
Gates Co. NC
Camden Co. NC
Currituck Co. NC
Virginians Against OLF
VA groups:
please make contact.

SEIS
Facts & Timeline
Featured News
News
Events
Allies
Related Sites
Contact
NC & VA Military Facilities
How Can I Help
Maps

The Navy vs Tundra Swans


News Notifications
Signup...
(details)
<Back<<Home > : Air Force Aware of Severe Bird Strike Hazard

Air Force Contractor Warns the Navy that its analysis of the aricraft-bird strike potential for the Washington county OLF site is flawed.

In a letter dated Oct. 13, 2003 from Maj. Ronald L. Merrit USAF (ret.), former USAF Chief of the Bird Aircraft Strike Hazard Team, to Secretary of the Navy, Gordon R. England, Mr. Merrit informed the Navy that the Airforce studies conclude the Washington county site "represents a serious threat to aircraft ".

Excerpt:

"I know that there are many elements that are considered in site selection and that there will always be impacts that cannot be avoided. However, the potential for a
catastrophic bird at the proposed site near Pocosin Lakes National Wildlife Refuge has not been fully addressed. The following should be considered:

  • The Bird Avoidance Model (BAM), a risk model developed by the US Air Force, forecasts severe bird strike potential for the Washington County site for 50% of the are very few places in the United States where level of threat exists.
  • The radar study at the proposed site near Lake was conducted late in the wintering season when bird populations would be declining. Even so, over a 12-day survey period, the vertical scanning radar detected over 450,000 birds moving through the 24-degree beam. Of these targets, over 40,000 were focks of large birds, and over 70,000 were identified as large birds. This represents a serious threat to aircraft safety during a twelve-day period at the end of winter.
  • The ROD suggest that bird detection rador would be considered as part of the bird strike mitigation program. This OLF cannot be operated safely without the use of a sophisticated bird detection system - yet nowhere in the United States is such a radar system operational on a daily basis. The US Navy does not have operational procedures to integrate bird detection radar into air traffic control."

 

Click here to read the letter.

The Plight Navy Caught Red Handed
Refuge in Danger
Exposing the Navy's Shenanigans Court of Appeals Hears Navy's Arguments
Navy Manipulated Choice (of OLF site) Navy officials pressured [by superiors] to justify the decision to build the field near the Pocosin Lakes National Wildlife Refuge Judge Finds Distortion in Navy Study Navy distorted an environmental impact study to justify the construction of an airfield near a large waterfowl refuge...
Gates: Cancel Navy flyover - Camden may send Navy similar request
Gates County commissioners have formally asked the U.S. Navy to drop its plans for a fighter-jet flyover, saying they don't know what purpose the demonstration would serve.
Landing field aids security
I would like to once again relay to the public why the Navy requires an additional outlying landing field, or OLF, to support field carrier-landing practice and why this new facility is vital to our national security.
N.C. wildfire now at 20,000 acres; evacuations ordered
The North Carolina wildfire that raged in three counties and sent smoke as far north as Chesapeake on Wednesday has grown to 20,500 acres today, according to the agency in charge of the firefighting efforts.